Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Week 3 Results - Eastside Squash Centre

See the Squash Matrix for more detail here: http://www.squashmatrix.com/DivisionResults.asp?DivisionID=4397

Division Open Results
 Select Division

Teams Ladder
TeamRound      1      2      3












    Total
Genesys  Comp Points111012












33
Rubbers323












8
Games9810












27
Kingborough 1  Comp Points10712












29
Rubbers223












7
Games8710












25
Uni Slab  Comp Points11116












28
Rubbers331












7
Games996












24
Uni 2  Comp Points4146












24
Rubbers141












6
Games4126












22
Aldanmark  Comp Points877












22
Rubbers211












4
Games877












22
Nut King  Comp Points7312












22
Rubbers103












4
Games7310












20

Competition points system used: 1 point per game, 0 Points per rubber, 2 points for an overall team win, 1 point for a team draw. Overall result is determined on rubbers, then games, then points. Zero by points.

Division Open Order Of Merit
To obtain a Rank a player must have played at least 4 matches in the last 6 months.
Rank  Player  Rating  Pos  Team Name  
1Mark de Vries298.171Aldanmark
2Sam Easther285.621Genesys
4Lars Becker267.651Kingborough 1
5Michael Brown264.341Uni Slab
6Ryan Flint258.861Uni 2
7David Mulcahy254.252Uni 2
8Peter Gartlan252.122Uni Slab
11Simon Lane246.552Genesys
12Kane Ingham244.991Nut King
13Leigh Ellis242.112Nut King
14Hamish Laws241.423Uni Slab
15Steve Giudici239.122Kingborough 1
16Jesse Youd233.613Kingborough 1
18Mark Hudson232.623Genesys
19Marc Owen231.833Nut King
20Paul Rodgers231.824Nut King
22Paul Jones231.162Aldanmark

Joel Fishwick230.274Kingborough 1
23Bill Hanley225.563Uni 2
24Cameron Booth223.414Uni Slab
26Lance Shutt222.684Aldanmark

Trevor Scott221.514Uni 2
27Morgan McGuire220.873Aldanmark
30David Pentecost219.094Genesys

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Week 2 Results - Kingborough

See the Squash Matrix site here: http://www.squashmatrix.com/DivisionResults.asp?DivisionID=4397


Division Open Results
 Select Division

Teams Ladder
TeamRound      1      2








    Bonus
Points
    Total
Uni Slab  Comp Points1111022
Rubbers33
6
Games99
18
Genesys  Comp Points1110021
Rubbers32
5
Games98
17
Uni 2  Comp Points414018
Rubbers14
5
Games412
16
Kingborough 1  Comp Points107017
Rubbers22
4
Games87
15
Aldanmark  Comp Points87015
Rubbers21
3
Games87
15
Nut King  Comp Points73010
Rubbers10
1
Games73
10

Competition points system used: 1 point per game, 0 Points per rubber, 2 points for an overall team win, 1 point for a team draw. Overall result is determined on rubbers, then games, then points. Zero by points.

Division Open Order Of Merit
To obtain a Rank a player must have played at least 4 matches in the last 6 months.
Rank  Player  Rating  Pos  Team Name  
1Mark de Vries298.171Aldanmark
2Sam Easther285.181Genesys
4Michael Brown266.141Uni Slab
5Lars Becker265.851Kingborough 1
6Ryan Flint259.31Uni 2
7David Mulcahy257.92Uni 2
8Peter Gartlan256.342Uni Slab
11Kane Ingham244.491Nut King
12Simon Lane242.92Genesys
13Leigh Ellis240.012Nut King
14Hamish Laws239.43Uni Slab
15Jesse Youd235.553Kingborough 1
16Steve Giudici234.92Kingborough 1
18Paul Jones232.672Aldanmark
19Mark Hudson232.623Genesys
21Marc Owen230.723Nut King
22Paul Rodgers229.964Nut King

Joel Fishwick227.274Kingborough 1
23Cameron Booth226.414Uni Slab
24Bill Hanley225.563Uni 2
25Lance Shutt224.44Aldanmark

Trevor Scott223.874Uni 2
27Morgan McGuire221.63Aldanmark
30David Pentecost216.734Genesys

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Week 1 - Results

Direct from the Matrix: (if anybody knows of a better results layout or more details, please let me know)

Division Open Results
Select Division

Teams Ladder
TeamRound123456789101112131415 Bonus
Points
Total
Genesys Comp Points11 011
Rubbers3
3
Games9
9
Uni Slab Comp Points11 011
Rubbers3
3
Games9
9
Kingborough 1 Comp Points10 010
Rubbers2
2
Games8
8
Kingborough 2 Comp Points8 08
Rubbers2
2
Games8
8
Nut King Comp Points7 07
Rubbers1
1
Games7
7
Uni 2 Comp Points4 04
Rubbers1
1
Games4
4

Competition points system used: 1 point per game, 0 Points per rubber, 2 points for an overall team win, 1 point for a team draw. Overall result is determined on rubbers, then games, then points. Zero by points.

Division Open Order Of Merit
To obtain a Rank a player must have played at least 4 matches in the last 6 months.
Rank Player Rating Pos Team Name
1Mark de Vries298.021Kingborough 2
2Sam Easther284.131Genesys
4Lars Becker266.91Kingborough 1
5Michael Brown265.941Uni Slab
6Ryan Flint257.991Uni 2
7Peter Gartlan255.622Uni Slab
8David Mulcahy255.522Uni 2
11Kane Ingham245.571Nut King
12Simon Lane240.882Genesys
13Hamish Laws240.083Uni Slab
14Leigh Ellis239.992Nut King
15Steve Giudici236.642Kingborough 1
16Jesse Youd234.313Kingborough 1
17Marc Owen234.213Nut King
18Paul Jones233.392Kingborough 2
20Mark Hudson232.623Genesys
22Paul Rodgers229.964Nut King

Joel Fishwick227.274Kingborough 1
23Lance Shutt226.344Kingborough 2
24Cameron Booth224.474Uni Slab

Bill Hanley222.263Uni 2
26Morgan McGuire221.753Kingborough 2

Trevor Scott221.474Uni 2
30David Pentecost215.584Genesys
Initial Rating
This is a guide to the position a player should be playing at.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

1st night of Super League - What do you think?

The first round of the newly formerd Super League was held on Tuesday 9th Feb 2010 at University.

The new courts were a fitting place to host the new league with its new format, point a rally to 11, best of five games. Same rules apply as usual and double yellow dots are used.

The teams are based upon the Matrix rankings, making teams more even across the league.

I guess at this early stage, the most contentious issue is the games going to 11.

Most teams were finished by just after 10pm, when in the old format, there might be one or even two matches still to be played. What was your experience, and do you think that playing to 15 is better? Did you have a challenging match?

Fill-ins also pose a challenge. Basically, fill-ins can be from any club, and can only fill in positions where the regular player has a higher matrix ranking. Adding to this, the organiser of the old pennant has changed the A1 night from Wednesday to Tuesday, in direct competition.

Where does this put players that aren't in the Super League, but still want to play in the highest pennant grade?

Is it doubtful that any other A1 players will play in the old league?

Overall, the majority of comments were positive, with many players enjoying the different games. Will this new shine wear off? Will this encourage other players to get involved?

Add your comments below, be anonymous or add display your name, the choice is yours.

Stay tuned for a updates, the next pennant night is next Tuesday at Kingston.